Democrats from California’s congressional delegation have proposed legislation to remove the words husband and wife from all federal laws in light of the legalization of same sex marriage. Similar efforts are being attempted in states such as Texas to remove mother & father. It should not surprise Americans when legislation is filed to eliminate the exclusionary celebrations of Mother’s day and Father’s day. 

Click here for the story 

Duck Dynasty Star wins debate, A & E backs down

Click here for the story

Religious Liberty versus sexual norms  Click here for the story

Duck Dynasty Family Happy over return Click here for the story

You decide, read the GQ article Click here

November 7, 2013

Fox news; Billy Graham, My Hope for America

Click here for a great story

Divided Supreme Court issues controversial decisions on homosexual marriage

In two cases before the court; one challenging Section 3 of the Federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) which recognizes marriage as the union of one man and one woman pertaining to federal benefits and an appeal to a federal district court's decision overturning California's Proposition 8 which banned homosexual marriage, a divided court ruled 5-4 that DOMA violated the constitution's equal protection clause. The 2nd case was remanded back to the district court as the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the parties who appealed the case had no standing.

The effect of the rulings are the legal recognition by the federal government of homosexual marriages performed in the twelve states where they are legal pertaining to federal benefits and legalizing homosexual marriage in California. What the court did not do was find a constitutional right to homosexual marriage and did not overturn the thirty state constitutional amendments limiting marriage as a union of one man and one woman. Chief Justice Roberts made that point clear,  “I think it … important to point out that its analysis leads no further. The court does not have before it, and the logic of its opinion does not decide, the distinct question whether the states, in the exercise of their ‘historic and essential authority to define the marital relation,’ … may continue to utilize the traditional definition of marriage.” Read more ..........

The cost of the new normal

May 14, 2013

Call to Action:  Urge the national delegates to vote NO
Tell the Boy Scouts to keep Sex & Politics out
The issue: On May 22nd to May 23rd, 1400 delegates will vote on a proposal to change the current membership policy to allow open homosexuality in Boy Scouts		61% support current policy
		Maintain standards
		Perry: Not on my watch
		Heritage: Change bad Idea
		Contact TR Council
	Click image for more information

February 6, 2013

BSA Board defers decision

After hearing from thousands of it's members, the BSA have decided to defer their decision to the 1400 member national committee which will vote in May on whether to retain their membership rules. The change faces an uphill battle. During a recent two year study on the issue, 92% of members support the current policy. Even so, it is still important to keep up the pressure. 

February 4, 2013

Show courage.

Stand firm for timeless values.

News reports indicate that the national leaders of the Boy Scouts are considering changing their longstanding policy against having openly homosexual Scout leaders or Scouts.

This would be a grave mistake.

Every American who believes in freedom of thought and religious liberty should be alarmed by the attacks upon the Boy Scouts, who have had core convictions about morality for 100 years. Every Scout takes an oath to keep himself “morally straight.” The Boy Scouts have every right to include sexual conduct in how they define that term. Many of our organizations stood with the Boy Scouts when the Supreme Court of the United States upheld their right to maintain their membership standards. To compromise moral principles under political and financial pressure would teach boys cowardice, not courage.

Every parent concerned about guiding and protecting their own children should also be alarmed by the proposed change to Boy Scout policy. As the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) confirmed as recently as last July, “the vast majority of the parents” of Boy Scouts reserve to themselves the right to introduce and give guidance on sexual topics. In addition, the current policy is part of the BSA’s efforts to protect Scouts from sexual abuse. Last year BSA released their so-called “perversion files,” which contained the names of hundreds of sexual predators who had managed to hide their attraction to boys and enter the Boy Scouts. How will parents be able to entrust their children to the Boy Scouts if they trade the well-being of the boys for corporate dollars?

Sign the petition

July 25, 2012

A disagreement of values and hate

August 1, 2012

NY City Council Speaker Quinn Violates Law; Uses Office to Threaten Chick fil-A

In an effort to punish Chick fil-A for the views of it's CEO, the City Council Speaker sent a letter using the official letter head of New York City demanding that New York University cancel their contract to allow Chick fil-A to operate on campus. The City Council which recently approved plans for New York University to expand, has an inordinate amount of influence over the University. Her effort to unlawfully intimidate New York University to violate the law is disgraceful. Specifically her action violates Chick fil-A's first amendment right as a business to express it's views without intervention by the government.

August 1, 2012

Michael Malone: A Century of Eagle Scouts

The Eagles' service project is the single greatest youth-service initiative in history, and one that has touched every community in America in an important way

Click here for the story

May 8, 2012

North Carolina Marriage Amendment blow out!

With a 22 percent margin, North Carolina voters gave traditional marriage a decisive victory by passing a constitutional amendment to define marriage as the union of one man and one women. According to proponents, the amendment was needed due to judicial activism where judges override the will of the people and legislators who re-define marriage without the consent of the governed. The amendment codifies the definition of marriage and prohibits other parallel legal schemes that provide all the benefits of marriage without being called marriage.

The recent comments by Vice President Biden and Education Secretary Arne Duncan supporting homosexual marriage apparently backfired along with the President's political confusion over what position to take. When asked whether he supports homosexual marriage, the Vice President stated, “I am absolutely comfortable with the fact that men marrying men, women marrying women.... Apparently North Carolina voters were not.

Check on the results here

February 7, 2012

The 9th Circuit court of appeals today in a 2 to 1 decision, upheld Judge Walker's ruling that California's voter approved ban on homosexual marriage was unconstitutional. The court ruled that the ban violated the 14th Amendment equal protection clause and that the People of California has no rational basis to ban homosexual marriage. Proponents of traditional marriage have vowed to file an immediate appeal. The case can be appealed to the full 9th Circuit court of appeals and or to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Click here for the story

Click here for analysis of the District Court's ruling

Evil in our midst: Mainstreaming Pedophilia

This bizarre article from the UK's Guardian Newspaper actually questions whether pedophilia causes harm. The article also quotes researchers who now refer to this criminal conduct as "a distinct sexual orientation". The fact that any educated human being holds a view mainstreaming evil shows how low we have sunk as a society.